Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C55-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive1.12% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 69% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55-B  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 21:33
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 51.3
2-Core 88.6
47% 71.6 Pts
4-Core 88.7
8-Core 129
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 93.1
6% 93.1 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F920) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.28% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 4.2
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.1
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.28%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Ghost SSD 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0701A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 1.8 5.9 4.2 12 6.7 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
1.12% Terrible
Read 6
Write 14.5
Mixed 10.4
SusWrite 7
2% 9.48 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
2% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 83%
Specific STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
15GB free, PID 0918
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.6 1.7 0.8 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2
Write 0.7
SusWrite 1.1
1% 1.27 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-136.A00LF Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 15% 13 43 27 60 15.6" 1366 768 LGD039F
History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 6: 0R 2G 0B
Typical Satellite C55-B Builds (Compare 398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback