Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite L300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L300  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 12:15
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T3400-$70
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 48.2
32% 44.7 Pts
4-Core 47.6
8-Core 48.2
6% 47.9 Pts
64-Core 49
3% 49 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RSS10009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 7.4 6.6 6.8 50 217 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 246
Write 226
Mixed 193
SusWrite 51.3
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 20.8
68% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 31.3
DQ Mixed 48.2
41% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 79%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
14GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 1.5 1.5 1.7 8 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 32.4
Write 25.7
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 6.9
29% 23 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 4.8
376% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 2 1 64 0" 1028 720
Typical Satellite L300 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback