Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 UD  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateApr 18 '21 at 08:02
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$138
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 61.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 295
87% 167 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 984
93% 769 Pts
64-Core 1,465
91% 1,465 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3505 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.9% Very good
Lighting 88.2
Reflection 89.8
Parallax 82.1
72% 86.7 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 79
Splatting 72.2
69% 86.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
483GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 275 393 175 223 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61% Good
Read 572
Write 2,057
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 268
166% 733 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 38.1
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 464
272% 269 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 61%
Great: 305%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
236GB free
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 162 231 265 269 268 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 455
Write 259
Mixed 254
SusWrite 236
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 15.4
86% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 23.5
61% 127 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
647GB free
Firmware: CC77
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 152 156 155 153 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 146
Write 117
Mixed 76
SusWrite 153
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
19GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 79 92 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 248
Write 94.5
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 91.5
142% 125 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 8.9
727% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 10.8
845% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 20.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 UD Builds (Compare 1,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 UD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback