Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H87M-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '21 at 15:29
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 170
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 328
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Gigabyte(1458 379D) 3GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 37
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 38.4
30% 38 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 25.7
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 30%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$57
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 371 368 371 367 358 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 434
Mixed 414
SusWrite 357
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 58
188% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 115%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
424GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 432 443 444 435 443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 433
Mixed 388
SusWrite 418
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 57.2
186% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
2TB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 59 87 72 29 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 97
Write 83.6
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 68.9
54% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 68%
MB4000GEQNH 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: HPG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 43 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 188
Write 42.8
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 42.9
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.4
132% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87M-HD3 Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87M-HD3 - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback