Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z170-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z170-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440x1440x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150724
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 09:16
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 136
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 262
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2200
Nvidia(10DE 131B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1746 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.9% Average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 50.8
41% 54 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 52.8
Splatting 60.5
48% 57.7 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 793 693 702 619 683 661 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,607
Write 1,154
Mixed 1,178
SusWrite 692
259% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 31
119% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 472
DQ Mixed 415
316% 423 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 162%
Great: 410%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 125 123 125 126 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 182
Write 199
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 125
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$55
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 111 111 113 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 97.4
Write 112
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 112
62% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 108%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 32GB
28GB free, PID 16a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 7.5 5.3 9.2 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 27.8
Write 24.2
SusWrite 8.3
24% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Mixed 1.1
84% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 19.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 17
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 5 100 34" 1280 720 SAM0DC4 CF791
Typical GA-Z170-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback