Today's hottest deals

HP p6620f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP p6620f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 20:04
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 830
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 66
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 80.9
40% 62.3 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 156
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 2AB1) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 06.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 14 20 25 28 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 95.3
Write 101
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 27.9
55% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 75%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$64
81GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 14 20 26 28 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 106
Write 101
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 28.1
58% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.1
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 54.6" 1280 720 XXX2851 Beyond TV
Typical p6620f Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP p6620f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback