bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 20:49
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 116
52% 84.5 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 184
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
Sapphire(174B BE42) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 3
Parallax 1
1% 1.9 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 5
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 61 60 80 60 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.8% Poor
Read 195
Write 137
Mixed 117
SusWrite 66.5
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 13.9
32% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.1
DQ Write 29.8
DQ Mixed 20.9
17% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-003.A00LF 99U5402-002.A01LF 99U5402-003.A00LF 99U5402-002.A01LF 4GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 13.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback