Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z270 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170213
Uptime21.3 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 23:38
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 212
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 468
56% 429 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.5% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 114
Parallax 115
104% 119 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 129
Splatting 94.6
88% 110 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,558
Write 1,203
Mixed 500
239% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 44.3
158% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 668
DQ Mixed 636
536% 788 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
12GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 410
Mixed 382
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 42.3
150% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 16GB
4GB free, PID 55a1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.7 5.4 5.7 5.4 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 10
SusWrite 5.7
11% 8.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Pro4 - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $760
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback