Acer Aspire TC-865

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-865  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-865
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 21:38
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 745
77% 622 Pts
64-Core 739
46% 739 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Acer(1025 1238) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.43 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.5
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 106 136 181 185 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 192
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 159
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
303GB free
Firmware: 77.04D77
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 74 74 74 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 82.9
Write 84.4
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 73
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE Adata AO2P26KC8T1-BPYS 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 24
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 24.2
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-865 Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-865

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback