Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 13:05
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 252
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 676
71% 570 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2790 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 176
Parallax 156
132% 164 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 146
Splatting 118
106% 130 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 186 156 180 195 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 441
Write 427
Mixed 321
SusWrite 200
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 48.3
148% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 199
158% 229 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 118%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
243GB free
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 207 203 207 202 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 438
Write 234
Mixed 233
SusWrite 207
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 19.5
70% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 71.7
DQ Mixed 95.4
72% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 65%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
9GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.1 6 6 6 6 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Read 18.4
Write 1.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.9
8% 7.42 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
30% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 9%
WDC WD15 EARS-00J2GB0 1.5TB
31GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 35 37 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 32.6
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 36.3
40% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 38%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 178 183 182 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 179
Mixed 110
SusWrite 182
223% 169 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 1
417% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 1
462% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.8% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.2
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $920
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback