Positivo POS-PIQ77CL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-PIQ77CL  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIQ77CL
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130308
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 22:55
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 365
49% 367 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
XFX(1682 318B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.6% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 7.2
7% 8.3 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7.3
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.6%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 37 39 39 40 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 363
Write 45.2
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 41.8
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 14.8
53% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 50.5
DQ Mixed 36.6
43% 77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 197 204 205 206 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 169
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 203
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 118%
Great: 114%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 7.1 7.2 6 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Read 23
Write 7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 6.5
11% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
14% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FH8N6TNFQG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-PIQ77CL Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIQ77CL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback