Today's hottest deals

Notebook W65_67SJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook W65_67SJ  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SJ
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '22 at 11:35
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 150
58% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 360
39% 311 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 850M
Clevo(1558 6501) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 17.8
17% 18.4 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 15.3
13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AXM14S3-128GM-B 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.2c
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 134 139 135 138 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 330
Write 151
Mixed 197
SusWrite 134
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 29.4
115% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 166
127% 174 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 74%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
558GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 117 118 120 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 52.7
Write 79.8
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 117
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
142% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
70GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 66 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 64.2
Write 59.6
Mixed 41.9
SusWrite 66.1
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 63%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 8.6 9.4 8.4 9.5 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Read 4
Write 2.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 9
6% 4.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMT41GS6BFR8A-PBHC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.2
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_67SJ Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback