Asrock 990FX Extreme3

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110913
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '17 at 19:47
Run Duration	1193 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	84%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 80.3 1-Core 61.5 2-Core 116 54% 85.8 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 257 29% 227 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.861.0.0 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.94% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.12 Parallax 0.03 0% 0.12 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 0.13 2% 3.57 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 0.94% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 128GB S550 128GB 134 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q061 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 12 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 100 (A3) Unknown 100 100 14 (A4) Unknown 100 100 771 (A5) Unknown 100 100 3 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 1 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1992 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1008 (F5) Unknown 100 100 956	40.1% Average	Read 480 Write 20.7 Mixed 433 68% 311 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 4.71 51% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 82.4 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 1.63 36% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 125288312 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2362 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 759278 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 4195 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 724 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 61 572456991 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 137 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 25290 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 94489280543 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 65274912965373 (F1) Unknown 100 253 10406486876 (F2) Unknown 100 253 9587229385	68.8% Good	Read 124 Write 116 Mixed 152 99% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.24 83% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 305GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 203 199 5825 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4110 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18827 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2732 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 730 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 149 149 154815 (C2) HDA temperature 113 91 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	40.8% Average	Read 67.9 Write 74.8 Mixed 59.6 50% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.01 4K Write 0.22 4K Mixed 0.01 6% 0.08 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 59%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 98.6 Write 102 Mixed 10.2 82% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.22 86% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 48%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00AZ6B0 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24% Poor	Read 70.9 Write 56.8 Mixed 14.1 54% 47.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.19 22% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 45%
ST350032 0AS 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 454GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 101 Write 100 Mixed 12.6 83% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.44 70% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 41%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 450GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.1% Below average	Read 89.1 Write 79.6 Mixed 29.1 78% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.28 41% 0.63 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 6,862 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.8 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme3 Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme3 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	90x
FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	54x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	44x

GPU
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	15x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $31Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	14x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $777

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353