Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '21 at 13:50
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 886
87% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,124
70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2320) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 31.8
20% 30.1 fps
MRender 27.4
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 22.3
20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2256HCHQ-00B 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7AK2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 547 542 539 543 538 548 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,026
Write 819
Mixed 812
SusWrite 543
231% 1,050 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 61.8
238% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,168
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 654
541% 794 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 225%
Great: 351%
Crucial M550 mSATA 512GB-$458
411GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 466 467 471 473 473 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 474
Mixed 331
SusWrite 467
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 42.2
150% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 233
210% 317 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Klevv CRAS C720 M.2 NVMe SSD 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2091 894 541 542 541 542 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,395
Write 2,246
Mixed 1,464
SusWrite 858
337% 1,491 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 77.9
258% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 713
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 988
674% 821 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 222%
Great: 260%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 135 135 135 141 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66% Good
Read 95
Write 133
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 135
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron AFLD48FH1P 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
90% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 35.6
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 35.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $643
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback