Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite Pro C640

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite Pro C640  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '21 at 07:40
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 49.9
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 82.3
38% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 155
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FDF2) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN05999
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 42 58 34 67 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.1% Average
Read 236
Write 21.2
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 42.5
18% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 25.6
76% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 153
110% 142 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
271GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 77
Write 68.8
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 78.1
46% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5428-011.A02LF TSB1066D3S7ELF/2G 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.1
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite Pro C640 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite Pro C640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback