Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 10:31
Run Duration379 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 149
2-Core 306
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 739
81% 641 Pts
64-Core 847
52% 847 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 772 782 781 770 772 773 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2481
Write 2,218
Mixed 1,733
SusWrite 775
403% 1,802 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 92.3
294% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,375
DQ Write 1,051
DQ Mixed 1,025
818% 1,150 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 293%
Great: 346%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
470GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8937
Write 8775
Mixed 2,493
1,488% 6,735 MB/s
4K Read 724
4K Write 336
4K Mixed 466
1,871% 508 MB/s
DQ Read 1,877
DQ Write 1,263
DQ Mixed 1,332
1,058% 1,491 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
544GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1410 1418 1394 1414 1418 1421 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,475
Write 1,390
Mixed 1,032
SusWrite 1,412
299% 1,327 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 79.7
276% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 270
356% 634 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 267%
Great: 295%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
777GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 81 79 81 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 86.8
Write 84.2
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 79.2
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
215GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 161 162 162 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 140
Write 131
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 162
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$89
1TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 122 130 126 124 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 95.9
Write 101
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 126
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 75%
Samsung SSD 870 QVO 2TB
223GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 289 159 158 157 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 360
Write 356
Mixed 325
SusWrite 220
422% 316 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 36.6
3,097% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 38.2
3,468% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 265%
Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 31.9
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 31.1
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $710
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback