Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 09:05
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 216
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 730
72% 588 Pts
64-Core 915
57% 915 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 85.2
Reflection 112
Parallax 70.9
69% 89.2 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 90.9
Splatting 77.7
72% 88.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$32
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 134 137 132 137 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 423
Write 285
Mixed 164
SusWrite 148
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 14.1
67% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 93.4
DQ Mixed 29.4
43% 80.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 55%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
339GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1894 1028 813 817 820 819 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,363
Write 1,920
Mixed 1,616
SusWrite 1,032
387% 1,733 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 70.8
232% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 464
389% 582 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 258%
Great: 346%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1870 1037 823 816 824 826 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,378
Write 1,571
Mixed 1,526
SusWrite 1,033
363% 1,627 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 72.8
236% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 466
389% 582 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 260%
Great: 346%
Intel Raid Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 5.4 11 4.7 3.4 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 166
Write 109
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 14.3
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.3
179% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 53
MC Mixed 43.8
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 19.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 116%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback