Asus N3050M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus N3050M-E (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150609
Uptime	12.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '21 at 23:30
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% FCBGA15, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	5.91% Terrible	Memory 4.38 1-Core 21.2 2-Core 42.1 11% 22.6 Pts	4-Core 43.2 8-Core 40.3 6% 41.8 Pts	64-Core 42.2 3% 42.2 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 5.91% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.54% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.5 1% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 3.1 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.54% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 61 73 45 61 76 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.9% Poor	Read 130 Write 151 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 68 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 10.4 34% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 75 DQ Write 53.4 DQ Mixed 32.3 33% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR3 1600 8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 3.6 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 459 9% 459 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N3050M-E Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus N3050M-E

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	7x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	7x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	1x
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	2x
16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 1x4GBMicronBench 26%, 1,487 samples	1x
M378B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 29%, 952 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16