Today's hottest deals

HP 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8175
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 22:19
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3060
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6% Terrible
Memory 6.56
1-Core 18.6
2-Core 27.5
10% 17.6 Pts
4-Core 30.9
8-Core 34.5
4% 32.7 Pts
64-Core 28.4
2% 28.4 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 8175) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 1.3
0% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1003YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 93 94 95 80 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 72.2
Mixed 43
SusWrite 85.1
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.7 GB/s
Latency 437
9% 437 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 26 9 7 60 15.5" 1366 768 BOE0662
Typical 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback