MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 07:49
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 176
79% 131 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 676
69% 560 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3625 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 172
Parallax 174
148% 176 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 152
Splatting 127
125% 156 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$104
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 94 122 126 135 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 360
Write 81.3
Mixed 133
SusWrite 122
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 13.7
52% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 8.4
DQ Mixed 15.8
55% 132 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 120%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
7GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 30 29 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 166
Write 30.8
Mixed 36
SusWrite 29
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
684GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 34 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 124
Write 31.7
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 33
40% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 101%
External USB3.0 DISK01 4TB
146GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 133 151 119 102 137 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.8% Above average
Read 157
Write 168
Mixed 114
SusWrite 128
191% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
140% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
External USB3.0 DISK00 4TB
192GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 3.5 1.1 1 4.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26% Poor
Read 109
Write 139
Mixed 112
SusWrite 11.6
124% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 58%
External USB3.0 DISK04 3TB
405GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 32 3.6 0.8 0.9 2.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
Read 167
Write 152
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 11.2
111% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
82% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%
External USB3.0 DISK02 3TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 150 77 42 137 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.6% Above average
Read 151
Write 148
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 107
140% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%
External USB3.0 DISK01 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 8.5 1.1 0.5 1.5 1.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 158
Write 160
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 3.7
108% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 60%
External USB3.0 DISK02 2TB
472GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 25 2.8 1.1 2.9 2.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 123
Write 39.2
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 17.7
62% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
135% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK03 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 90 94 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 104
Write 58.8
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 87.2
98% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 69%
External USB3.0 DISK04 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 85 90 93 85 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 131
Write 124
Mixed 114
SusWrite 78.9
149% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 6,897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback