Asrock TRX40 Creator

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 234%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock TRX40 Creator  (all builds)
Memory85.8 GB free of 96 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 12:09
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3970X-$1,900
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 70.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 296
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 1,135
99% 845 Pts
64-Core 5,431
336% 5,431 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Nvidia(10DE 1323) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 204
Parallax 232
169% 215 fps
MRender 268
Gravity 207
Splatting 168
170% 214 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 156%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$72
522GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 355 428 419 382 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 417
Mixed 404
SusWrite 403
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 45.7
149% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 184
142% 194 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
193GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 283 307 307 307 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 443
Mixed 397
SusWrite 316
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 52.3
173% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
870GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 332 376 363 364 359 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 397
Write 432
Mixed 287
SusWrite 365
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 33.3
126% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 158
130% 187 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
649GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 370 450 451 452 450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 442
Mixed 400
SusWrite 437
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 43
146% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 101%
Great: 121%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
233GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 36.3
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 36.7
46% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 19%
WDC WD20EZRX-00D 2TB
665GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 114 115 115 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 112
Write 114
Mixed 85
SusWrite 115
145% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVK F4-3200C16-8GVK F4-3200C16-8GVK F4-3200C16-8GVK Micron 16ATF4G64AZ-3G2B1 Micron 16ATF4G64AZ-3G2B1 95GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.8% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 23.5
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TRX40 Creator Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 314%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock TRX40 Creator

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $3,059
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback