Hasee CP77S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHasee CP77S  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P7xxDM2(-G)
Memory40.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20161020
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 07:48
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 148
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 283
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7705) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.8% Very good
Lighting 92.4
Reflection 122
Parallax 104
75% 106 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 93.5
Splatting 102
80% 96.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 267 358 502 539 488 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,758
Write 867
Mixed 852
SusWrite 422
215% 975 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 45.2
149% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 554
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 277
232% 345 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 159%
Great: 293%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
857GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 29 32 31 31 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
90GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 72 78 109 121 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 328
Write 298
Mixed 245
SusWrite 90
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 21.5
77% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 91.6
135% 252 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 95%
Samsung MZNTE512HMJH-000SO 512GB
235GB free
Firmware: EXT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 242 264 262 257 249 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 441
Write 346
Mixed 218
SusWrite 246
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 30.4
112% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 87.4
121% 226 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 0813 WAR4S2666D19161C M471A1K43BB0-CPB 0813 WAR4S2666D19161C 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.3% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CP77S Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: Hasee CP77S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback