Hasee CP77S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHasee CP77S  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P7xxDM2(-G)
Memory41.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20161020
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 12:15
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 100
2-Core 177
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 306
38% 289 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7705) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.3% Very good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 122
Parallax 95.1
75% 103 fps
MRender 94.1
Gravity 93.7
Splatting 101
79% 96.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,066
Write 1,230
Mixed 200
184% 832 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 75.5
206% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 907
DQ Write 452
DQ Mixed 350
348% 570 MB/s
Poor: 148% Great: 293%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
928GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 399
Write 392
Mixed 346
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 37.7
125% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 352
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
221GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 334
Write 358
Mixed 222
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 15.3
58% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 199
178% 271 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 95%
Samsung MZNTE512HMJH-000SO 512GB
451GB free
Firmware: EXT2300Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 431
Write 334
Mixed 188
70% 318 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 24.2
95% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 88.6
120% 223 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 0813 WAR4S2666D19161C M471A1K43BB0-CPB 0813 WAR4S2666D19161C 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.2
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CP77S Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: Hasee CP77S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback