Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3150 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 27.6 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 41.6 19% 30 Pts	4-Core 78.7 8-Core 83.9 11% 81.3 Pts	64-Core 78.8 5% 78.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 22B1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 2.6 1% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40 2,820 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 109 108 106 114 114 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.3% Average	Read 136 Write 194 Mixed 164 SusWrite 113 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 26 88% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 110 100% 151 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CM0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 269 15% 269 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3150IntelBench 26%, 3,131 samples	3x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	3x

SSD
Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples	1x
MX500 500GBCrucial $44Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	1x

RAM
SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 36%, 2,036 samples	1x
M471B5273CM0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 6 samples	1x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	1x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16