Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics94.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire M5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M5910
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110215
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 21:53
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 160
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 386
41% 328 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 109
Parallax 113
97% 114 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 104
Splatting 93.3
89% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 113 226 226 228 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.8% Above average
Read 232
Write 223
Mixed 211
SusWrite 174
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 19.8
73% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 148
124% 178 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
147GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 70 70 70 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
40% Average
Read 69.2
Write 69.9
Mixed 50
SusWrite 69.9
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40%
Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
354GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 27.6
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 29.3
21% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.7
173% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M378B5273DH0-CH9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback