ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G501JW

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Asus G501JW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G501JW
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '21 at 01:27
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 200 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 527 54% 437 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 18DD) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 22.8 Reflection 18 Parallax 20.4 19% 20.4 fps	MRender 23.9 Gravity 23.4 Splatting 16.3 17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 26 3.3 24 137 73 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 406 Write 326 Mixed 289 SusWrite 81.8 61% 276 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 17.5 67% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 72.6 DQ Mixed 42.3 44% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB 20,023 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 420GB free Firmware: SE0OA4A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 15 17 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 69.7 Write 75.7 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 17.3 33% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 60%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 207GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 53GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 17 17 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.6% Poor	Read 62.3 Write 46.7 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 16.4 26% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 66% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 32%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 240GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 61GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 15 17 19 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 69.4 Write 59.5 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 16.7 30% 41.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung 8GB 676 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 16.8 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 13.9 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical G501JW Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G501JW

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	131x
Core i7-4750HQIntelBench 63%, 5,497 samples	45x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	85x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	63x
Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)IntelBench 6%, 5,483 samples	28x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,448 samples	36x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $290Bench 185%, 5,772 samples	26x
X300s SATA M.2 128GBSanDiskBench 71%, 618 samples	12x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GBHynixBench 51%, 658 samples	34x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix 16GBSamsungBench 53%, 472 samples	32x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung 8GBHynixBench 53%, 676 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback