HP 700-311na

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 700-311na  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 15:39
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 65.3
1-Core 98
2-Core 184
65% 116 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 586
54% 448 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 37.5
32% 39.5 fps
MRender 50.8
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 39.4
34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 417 420 432 429 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 426
Mixed 418
SusWrite 416
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 39.2
122% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 291
235% 333 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: HP36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 84 87 82 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 79.2
Write 120
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 84.5
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 2TB
188GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 52.9
Write 50.6
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 54.4
65% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 15.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 13.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-311na Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: HP 700-311na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback