Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 135% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 151% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	52.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210319
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '21 at 03:52
Run Duration	320 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9920X-$587 1,009 User benchmarks, average bench 86% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 72.2 1-Core 134 2-Core 267 85% 158 Pts	4-Core 536 8-Core 1,001 92% 768 Pts	64-Core 1,886 117% 1,886 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2281) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	154% Outstanding	Lighting 214 Reflection 198 Parallax 238 174% 217 fps	MRender 248 Gravity 200 Splatting 142 155% 197 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1353 1346 1319 1347 1301 1302 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	285% Outstanding	Read 1,951 Write 1,636 Mixed 1,523 SusWrite 1,328 361% 1,610 MB/s	4K Read 50.8 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 71.7 255% 94.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,201 DQ Write 922 DQ Mixed 1,041 784% 1,055 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 285% Great: 435%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 761GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 460 460 458 456 457 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 451 Mixed 423 SusWrite 458 102% 451 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 43 150% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 348 264% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 465GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 461 461 459 444 296 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 458 Mixed 443 SusWrite 430 102% 453 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 95.5 4K Mixed 44 156% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 355 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 129%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 188 200 196 195 199 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 160 Mixed 80.9 SusWrite 197 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.6 206% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 113%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB 6,863 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 559GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 134 130 134 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 123 Write 126 Mixed 83 SusWrite 133 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 80%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 466GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 192 193 192 192 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 212 Write 184 Mixed 137 SusWrite 192 134% 181 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.7 351% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 113%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 596GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 131 132 136 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 135 Write 115 Mixed 85.9 SusWrite 132 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 65%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 279GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 116 116 116 115 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 117 Write 114 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 116 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.2 224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 69%
Corsair Flash Voyager 4GB 198 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 35.9 Write 22 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 22.1 32% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 56% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	95.5% Outstanding	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 51.3 MC Mixed 32 109% 38.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 10.6 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 96.4 42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 699 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	181x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	135x
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	69x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,123

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16