Pcware IPMH310G 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPcware IPMH310G 2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH310G 2.0
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201111
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 21:15
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 739
79% 628 Pts
64-Core 820
51% 820 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 7.5
5% 5.8 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMX1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 396 400 408 404 407 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 312
Write 27
Mixed 214
SusWrite 402
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 33.8
128% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 188
162% 237 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 88%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
WA5SD8G8C3UAZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 24.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 25.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH310G 2.0 Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Pcware IPMH310G 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback