Pcware IPMH310G 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPcware IPMH310G 2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH310G 2.0
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '23 at 15:39
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 255
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 544
65% 504 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 37.5
Parallax 38.7
30% 37.9 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 27.5
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SWR256G-101IL 256GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 376
Write 398
Mixed 340
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 32.6
122% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 188
167% 247 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 76%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
67GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 36 34 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 29
Write 31.1
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 35.6
42% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
61% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
WA5SD8G8C3UAZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 23
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH310G 2.0 Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Pcware IPMH310G 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback