Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 22:33
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 200
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 650
62% 514 Pts
64-Core 881
54% 881 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 3.9
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 171 9.6 95 10 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 495
Write 426
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 85.3
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 0.6
30% 8.67 MB/s
DQ Read 48.5
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 0.6
8% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FJ 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 30
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 25.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback