Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 22:24
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900X
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 891
79% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,694
105% 1,694 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 90.8
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 83.2
74% 88.3 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 81
Splatting 73.7
71% 88.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 99 79 93 102 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 246
Write 150
Mixed 180
SusWrite 92
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 32.4
130% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 117
93% 128 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FJ 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 16.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 10.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback