Asus TUF GAMING H470-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H470-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 09:45
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900F-$231
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 156
2-Core 306
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 867
89% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,352
84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Lighting 291
Reflection 260
Parallax 297
237% 283 fps
MRender 319
Gravity 242
Splatting 173
192% 244 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 198%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
585GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 689 780 475 470 1190 478 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,798
Write 319
Mixed 1,212
SusWrite 680
221% 1,002 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 75
251% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,067
DQ Write 725
DQ Mixed 437
450% 743 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 231%
Great: 311%
Kingston SA400S371920G 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 439 441 440 438 435 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 493
Write 408
Mixed 400
SusWrite 438
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 25.3
108% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 86.2
109% 189 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 102%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 2TB
911GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 41.3
Write 39.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 35.3
51% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 72%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 802GB
73GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 41
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 4.4
39% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX3200C16D4/16GX KHX2666C16/8G 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 24.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 25.6
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING H470-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H470-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $879
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback