Dell OptiPlex 9020

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 9020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9020  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 15:30
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 226
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 584
62% 496 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Dell(1028 05A4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 7.2
3% 4.53 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 38
29% 38.2 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 26.9
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMSA230S 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02J0T4GB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 108 69 60 69 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 465
Write 400
Mixed 373
SusWrite 90.3
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 45.8
156% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 76
DQ Mixed 86.5
80% 128 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 95%
SSD 512G 512GB
116GB free
Firmware: S0330B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 350 47 45 47 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 464
Write 413
Mixed 357
SusWrite 159
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.4
48% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 24.8
DQ Mixed 2.3
25% 64 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 220%
HX256GSSDSATA3 256GB
78GB free
Firmware: Q0421B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 373 367 323 344 385 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 394
Write 342
Mixed 234
SusWrite 359
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 11.7
94% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 73.2
100% 178 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 86%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 88
Write 88.8
Mixed 34
SusWrite 52.8
85% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29%
Great: 44%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
27GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 22 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 42.2
Write 27.9
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 20.6
35% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 3.3
157% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 37%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
10GB free, PID 0736
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.8 8 7.1 6.6 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4% Terrible
Read 11
Write 15.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6.6
13% 9.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4%
Great: 18%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB
455GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 41 42 38 39 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 37.2
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 38.2
48% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
DDR3 1600 8G 1600 8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.8% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 15.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 9020 Builds (Compare 10,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback