Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 17:09
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 737
77% 620 Pts
64-Core 748
46% 748 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 40.2
31% 40.3 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 28.3
29% 36 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 480G 480GB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 408 406 417 414 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 384
Mixed 345
SusWrite 411
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 29.7
138% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 46.7
88% 169 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 103%
Liteon J8-L1128-11 M.2 2260 128GB
14GB free
Firmware: 0J71105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 162 166 171 167 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 286
Write 178
Mixed 154
SusWrite 166
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 32
125% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 131
108% 155 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 67%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
222GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 160 164 163 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 164
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 163
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
465GB free
Firmware: 0002LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 108 110 108 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 108
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 61%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
368GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 124 125 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 125
Write 99.9
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 124
141% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2666C19-8GNT 04CD F4-2400C17-8GNX 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.1% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback