Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 04:23
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 96.7
47% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 286
30% 243 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 163
Parallax 157
122% 157 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 158
Splatting 111
105% 130 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 313 250 250 241 239 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 411
Mixed 367
SusWrite 270
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 46.3
152% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 259
189% 246 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 134%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
5.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 151 155 159 145 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 147
Write 135
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 150
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
395% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 109%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 26.1
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 26.7
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.6
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback