PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | BOXX 3DBOXX W8920 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X9DAi |
Memory | 57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150509 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 18 '21 at 06:13 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
74.8%
Very good
|
69% 120 Pts
|
63% 534 Pts
|
111% 1,797 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.4%
Above average
|
56% 77.1 fps
|
46% 57.4 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 193 175 207 212 220 MB/s
|
59.8%
Above average
|
42% 187 MB/s
|
100% 34.2 MB/s
|
101% 150 MB/s
|
![]() WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 77.04D77
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 97 98 96 MB/s
|
55.2%
Above average
|
65% 88.8 MB/s
|
144% 1 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 116 119 119 121 MB/s
|
69.4%
Good
|
82% 112 MB/s
|
182% 1.37 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 178 178 178 177 MB/s
|
96%
Outstanding
|
103% 141 MB/s
|
232% 1.77 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
87.5%
Excellent
|
100% 35 GB/s
|
28% 9.97 GB/s
|
52% 77.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples | 2x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 2x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples | 1x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 6970AMDBench 20%, 9,594 samples | 1x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 1x |
R9 290XAMD $549Bench 51%, 37,353 samples | 1x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples | 2x |
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $130Bench 94%, 75,831 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 6% - Terrible | Total price: $132 |