BOXX 3DBOXX W8920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBOXX 3DBOXX W8920  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAi
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 06:13
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 184
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 702
63% 534 Pts
64-Core 1,797
111% 1,797 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.4% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 91.2
56% 77.1 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 44.3
46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 193 175 207 212 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.8% Above average
Read 240
Write 188
Mixed 121
SusWrite 197
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 26.9
100% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 117
101% 150 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 114%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 77.04D77
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 97 98 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 97.4
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 97
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 57%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 116 119 119 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 124
Write 117
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 118
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 178 178 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 152
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 178
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS BLS8G3D1609DS Samsung M378B1G73DB0- Samsung M378B1G73DB0- BLS8G3D1609DS BLS8G3D1609DS CT102464BA133 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 30.4
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3DBOXX W8920 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: BOXX 3DBOXX W8920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 6% - Terrible Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback