Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '21 at 20:00
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 633
64% 518 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Palit(1569 100A) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 87.8
52% 74.1 fps
MRender 81.5
Gravity 76
Splatting 60.2
58% 72.6 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 195 141 52 53 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 456
Mixed 358
SusWrite 114
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 56.3
189% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 246
215% 321 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
147GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 367 406 474 474 479 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 626
Write 529
Mixed 542
SusWrite 428
119% 531 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 85.6
285% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 615
DQ Mixed 908
620% 763 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 171%
Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
920GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 188 191 194 193 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 123
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 189
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
223GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 96 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 97.9
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 96.6
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 71%
SABRENT 1TB
847GB free
Firmware: 2210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 363 370 385 386 387 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 87%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 256GB
236GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 40.4
Write 38.4
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 41.1
54% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.4
234% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $810
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback