Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JA
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210602
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 06:13
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 80.5
46% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 247
26% 208 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 14F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 7.3
6% 7.1 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.9
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3128GNTD 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 507 269 104 106 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 750
Write 539
Mixed 563
SusWrite 253
117% 526 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 65.7
254% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 400
DQ Write 543
DQ Mixed 403
324% 448 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 144%
Great: 192%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
875GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 117 120 120 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 69.2
Write 119
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 118
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 20 20 21 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 17.1
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 18.5
26% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
79% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E3 8GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 23.7
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 21
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA Builds (Compare 740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback