Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion P6000 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion P6000 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A92
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 18:45
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 93.7
47% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 172
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Device(1B0A 909D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 2
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 67 87 95 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 114
Write 96.7
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 82.2
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
296GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 113
Write 107
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 117
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 88%
ST350063 0AS 500GB
269GB free, PID 070c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 15.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 14.6
24% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%
WDC WD25 00BEVT-60ZCT1 250GB
111GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 22.9
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 14.4
27% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion P6000 Series Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion P6000 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback