Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 22:12
Run Duration367 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 130
58% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 399
39% 317 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 377F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 106
Parallax 98.6
84% 103 fps
MRender 91.3
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 93.3
77% 94.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 223 223 220 222 223 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 362
Write 270
Mixed 154
SusWrite 220
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 32.6
98% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 39.2
36% 52.6 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 17
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 13.6
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback