Today's hottest deals

Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 00:25
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 125
55% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 420
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$115
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 59.4
52% 62.7 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 58.8
52% 63.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC6001024G 1TB
486GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 386 402 384 382 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 405
Mixed 361
SusWrite 368
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 41.5
138% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 228
177% 242 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95%
Great: 131%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$54
770GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 151 151 152 151 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 162
Write 148
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 149
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.3
28% 10 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $543
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback