Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 825F
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191212
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 02:41
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 174
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 475
50% 399 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
HP(103C 825F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.9% Average
Lighting 40
Reflection 40
Parallax 90.4
33% 56.8 fps
MRender 90.8
Gravity 90.7
Splatting 99.9
78% 93.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000H1 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 27 30 29 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 357
Write 33.5
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 27.9
25% 117 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 16.1
79% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 33.5
DQ Mixed 56.7
77% 151 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
393GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 96 94 88 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 130
Write 133
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 97.1
70% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 16
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback