Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B92
MotherboardMSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)  (all builds)
Memory120.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 13:48
Run Duration547 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 219
71% 131 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 880
78% 660 Pts
64-Core 2,272
141% 2,272 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.7% Very good
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 106
Parallax 97
78% 99.6 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 95.9
Splatting 95.3
78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 7 2TB
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 86 91 90 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 442
Write 504
Mixed 427
SusWrite 88.7
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 39.9
147% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 178
145% 200 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 318%
Amd-raid Array 4 1TB
598GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2579 2580 2572 2570 2561 2556 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,339
Write 2,563
Mixed 1,448
SusWrite 2,570
503% 2,230 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 56.4
184% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 430
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 425
324% 437 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 328%
Great: 328%
Amd-raid Array 5 1TB
753GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2591 2597 2590 2597 2594 2546 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 1,568
Write 2,548
Mixed 1,354
SusWrite 2,586
458% 2,014 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 52.3
175% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 509
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 457
368% 515 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 299%
Great: 318%
Amd-raid Array 8 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4365 4302 4183 3912 2899 2912 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
416% Outstanding
Read 2,311
Write 4,377
Mixed 1,997
SusWrite 3,762
708% 3,112 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 64.1
215% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 587
DQ Write 607
DQ Mixed 471
389% 555 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 416%
Great: 500%
Amd-raid Array 6 1TB
953GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2598 2604 2608 2608 2605 2603 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,182
Write 2,600
Mixed 1,420
SusWrite 2,604
497% 2,202 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 52.4
168% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 466
357% 482 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 321%
Great: 328%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
210GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 370 381 381 378 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 389
Mixed 375
SusWrite 378
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 48.8
159% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 320
243% 327 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
214GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 370 381 381 378 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 393
Mixed 371
SusWrite 378
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 48.9
158% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 312
241% 328 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 94 95 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 431
Write 510
Mixed 431
SusWrite 94.9
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 36.1
134% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 170
142% 198 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 499%
Amd-raid Array 3 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 88 78 80 77 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 136
Write 123
Mixed 93.6
SusWrite 79.5
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 196%
Amd-raid Array 2 16TB
7TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 90 89 87 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 253
Write 181
Mixed 162
SusWrite 90.3
127% 171 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 1.1
458% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 58.4
MC Write 59.8
MC Mixed 53.9
164% 57.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 23.7
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 144%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,634
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback