Acer Nitro AN515-51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Freed_KLS
Memory18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 21:52
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 199
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 561
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 47.7
Parallax 6.9
5% 20.3 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 69
Write 92.2
Mixed 135
22% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 11.3
79% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 126
121% 197 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 70%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
68GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 91 91 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 158
Write 8.9
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 92.2
61% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
182% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 859B CT16G4SFD8266.M16FRS 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 16.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 18.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-51 Builds (Compare 3,866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback