Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 02:07
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
CPU1 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 179
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 493
49% 400 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 131
Parallax 131
96% 127 fps
MRender 161
Gravity 103
Splatting 112
101% 126 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 594
Mixed 504
119% 533 MB/s
4K Read 107
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 100
340% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 500
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 373
306% 437 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
831GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.9 2 2.4 2.2 1.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Read 2.2
Write 2.2
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 2
3% 2.15 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
14% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.42%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade 4L7N2DF05ZP3UH-BYZ 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.3% Good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 24.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback