Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9200 APU (2016 M.SR) 1,116 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	24.9% Poor	Memory 37.3 1-Core 51 2-Core 76.2 33% 54.8 Pts	4-Core 73.7 8-Core 74.6 10% 74.1 Pts	64-Core 74.8 5% 74.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 078E) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.52% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 4 2% 3.63 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.52% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 221 214 220 214 223 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 446 Write 287 Mixed 213 SusWrite 221 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 22.5 104% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 153 115% 155 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 111%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 2,552 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 00ee Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.1 2 3.6 4.7 3.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	3.71% Terrible	Read 14 Write 4.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 3.8 8% 6.95 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.71% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 009C3523 KD48GS880-26N190A 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.9% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 7.3 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	55x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	33x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	8x

SSD
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	2x
hynix SC311 SATA 256GBSKBench 78%, 22,335 samples	2x
1100 SATA 256GBMicronBench 73%, 16,265 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBUnknownBench 32%, 1,226 samples	8x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	8x
HMA851S6CJR6N-UH 2x4GBUnknownBench 54%, 753 samples	7x