HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8906
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 13:15
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 162
2-Core 307
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 1,049
98% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,483
92% 1,483 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
HP(103C 8903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 137
Parallax 99.5
86% 114 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 101
Splatting 88.4
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,933
Write 5247
Mixed 5,472
1,238% 5,550 MB/s
4K Read 426
4K Write 264
4K Mixed 311
1,183% 334 MB/s
DQ Read 1057
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 818
631% 868 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kxg60znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
149GB free
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1346 551 406 395 388 409 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,383
Write 1,349
Mixed 1,134
SusWrite 582
249% 1,112 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 68.4
230% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1051
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 797
641% 905 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 205%
Great: 239%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
277GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 99 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 158
Write 150
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 97.2
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 113%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
14GB free, PID 00ee
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 1.1 3 2.6 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Read 14.9
Write 1
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 2.3
7% 6.67 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GU6CJR6N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 26.3
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 27.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx Builds (Compare 4,950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback