Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GU502GU
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190711
Uptime	14.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '21 at 09:52
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 168 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 558 54% 442 Pts	64-Core 642 40% 642 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 101F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.52% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 49.3 Parallax 3.1 2% 18.4 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.52% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 101F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.1% Below average	Lighting 42.5 Reflection 48 Parallax 36.4 35% 42.3 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 46.5 Splatting 47.7 30% 34.9 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 139 53 54 56 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 1,069 Write 788 Mixed 705 SusWrite 112 148% 668 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 48 161% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 575 DQ Mixed 219 233% 377 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G 16GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 16.9 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

System: Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU_GU502GU

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	363x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	196x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	167x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	251x
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	10x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	6x

RAM
M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 5,740 samples	164x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBMicronBench 74%, 5,735 samples	56x
M471A2G43AB1-CTD M471A2K43DB1-CTD 32GBSamsungBench 78%, 707 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16