Today's hottest deals

Axioo NEON HNM MODEL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAxioo NEON HNM MODEL  (all builds)
MotherboardAXIOO NEON HNM MODEL
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110309
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 11:25
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$55
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12% Very poor
Memory 21.1
1-Core 5.3
2-Core 13.7
10% 13.4 Pts
4-Core 18.7
8-Core 10.8
2% 14.8 Pts
64-Core 21.8
1% 21.8 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 12%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 9981) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 102 59 2.3 7.9 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 102
Write 73.9
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 42
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 3.2
455% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 153%
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50
274GB free
Firmware: GN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 69 72 80 80 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 55.9
Write 60.5
Mixed 13
SusWrite 71.1
36% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
67% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 878A T2G88S0-H9M 4GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.3
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.17 GB/s
Latency 312
13% 312 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NEON HNM MODEL Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Axioo NEON HNM MODEL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback